New Pleading in the Twenty-First Century: Slamming the Federal Courthouse Doors? is the first book to comprehensively analyze, critique, and provide solutions for the new pleading regime in U.S. federal courts. In two recent decisions, the U.S. Supreme Court dramatically altered the pleadings landscape by imposing a version of fact pleading and merits screening--what the author calls "New Pleading"--that has not existed in the U.S. for 70 years. The result of this abrupt regime change is a broad, significant, and adverse effect on litigant access to civil justice. But because of its nascence, no scholar has provided a comprehensive, doctrinal, theoretical, and prospective look at what it means for U.S. federal civil procedure, both in the United States and in the larger global community. This book takes on that task. It synthesizes a theoretical account of New Pleading, argues that New Pleading is inconsistent with a system of procedural justice, and provides two distinct solutions for rectifying the inconsistency: return to Old Pleading or the adoption of "New Discovery." Finally, this volume situates New Pleading and the solutions the author advocates in a wider international comparative context.

Auteur

Scott Dodson is a Professor of Law at University of California Hastings College of the Law, where he teaches Civil Procedure and Federal Courts. He has authored more than twenty-five articles appearing in Stanford Law Review, Michigan Law Review, California Law Review, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Virginia Law Review, Northwestern University Law Review, and Vanderbilt Law Review, among others. This is his second book.

Contenu

Preface Acknowledgments Introduction Chapter 1: Old Pleading, Through 2007 Chapter 2: New Pleading, 2007-2009 Chapter 3: The Effects of New Pleading Chapter 4: Curing New Pleading Chapter 5: Living with New Pleading Chapter 6: Comparing New Pleading (and New Discovery) Globally Index