Comparative Restorative Justice

This edited collection introduces and defines the concept of "comparative restorative justice", putting it in the context of power relations and inequality. It aims to compare the implementation and theoretical development of restorative justice internationally for research, policy and practice. In Part I, this volume compares practices in relation to the implementing environment - be that cultural, political, or societal. Part II looks at obstacles and enablers in relation to the criminal justice system, and considers whether inquisitorial versus adversarial jurisdictions have impact on how restorative justice is regulated and implemented. Finally, Part III compares the reasons that drive governments, regional bodies, and practitioners to implement restorative justice, and whether these impetuses impact on ultimate delivery.

Featuring fifteen original chapters from diverse authors and practitioners, this will serve as a key resource for those working in social justice orthose seeking to understand and implement the tenets of restorative justice comparatively.

• Introduces comparative restorative justice in the context of power relations and inequality;
• Discusses obstacles and enablers to implementing restorative justice in the criminal justice system;

• Features fifteen original chapters from around the globe discussing restorative justice comparatively.

Auteur
Professor Theo Gavrielides, PhD, is a legal philosopher and a world-known restorative justice expert. He is the Founder and Director of the Restorative Justice for All (RJ4All) International Institute, which aims to advance community cohesion and redistribute power through education and the values of restorative justice. He is also the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of RJ4All Publications, which is the publishing arm of the RJ4All International Institute.

Dr. Gavrielides is also a Visiting Professor at the University of East London, Distinguished Policy Fellow at the School of Regulation and Global Governance (REGNet), Australian National University, an Adjunct Professor at the School of Criminology of Simon Fraser University (Canada) as well as a Visiting Professor at Buckinghamshire New University (UK). In the past, he served as a Visiting Professorial Research Fellow at Panteion University of Social & Political Science (Greece) and as a Visiting Senior Research Fellow at the International Centre for Comparative Criminological Research (ICCCR) at Open University (UK).

He is the Editor-in-Chief of the peer-reviewed journals:

• International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare
• Youth Voice Journal
• Internet Journal of Restorative Justice

Texte du rabat
This edited collection introduces and defines the concept of comparative restorative justice, putting it in the context of power relations and inequality. It aims to compare the implementation and theoretical development of restorative justice internationally for research, policy and practice. In Part I, this volume compares practices in relation to the implementing environment - be that cultural, political, or societal. Part II looks at obstacles and enablers in relation to the criminal justice system, and considers whether inquisitorial versus adversarial jurisdictions have impact on how restorative justice is regulated and implemented. Finally, Part III compares the reasons that drive governments, regional bodies, and practitioners to implement restorative justice, and whether these impetuses impact on ultimate delivery.

Featuring fifteen original chapters from diverse authors and practitioners, this will serve as a key resource for those working in social justice or those seeking to understand and implement the tenets of restorative justice comparatively.

• Introduces comparative restorative justice in the context of power relations and inequality;
• Discusses obstacles and enablers to implementing restorative justice in the criminal justice system;
• Features fifteen original chapters from around the globe discussing restorative justice comparatively.

Contenu

1. Comparing the implementing environments in various countries.- 2. Comparing adversarial and inquisitorial systems in various countries.- 3. Comparing impetuses in various countries.