The Literal and Nonliteral in Language and Thought

The distinction between literal and nonliteral meaning can be traced back to folk models about the relationship between language and the world. According to these models, sentences can be seen as building a representation of the world they describe, and understanding a sentence means knowing how each linguistic element affects the construction of the representation. Papers in this volume connect these folk models to the more scientific notions of the literal/nonliteral distinction proposed by philosophers, linguists, and cognitive scientists. The current volume examines the literal/nonliteral distinction from a number of disciplinary and theoretical perspectives, outlining some of the problematic assumptions in traditional paradigms and pointing to promising directions for the study of meaning.

Auteur

The Editors: Seana Coulson (Ph.D. 1997) is an associate professor in the Cognitive Science Department at the University of California, San Diego, where she heads the Brain and Cognition laboratory. Her research interests include cognitive semantics and experimental pragmatics, with an emphasis on the cognitive and neural underpinnings of figurative language comprehension. She is on the editorial board of Cognitive Linguistics and Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Ph.D. 1972, Dr habil. 1987) is professor of English language and linguistics at the University of Lódz, where she holds the position of professor ordinarius and chair of English language. She is also honorary professor in linguistics and modern English language at the University of Lancaster. Her research interests are primarily in semantics and pragmatics of natural language, corpus linguistics and their applications in translation studies and lexicography. She has published books and papers in the area of Cognitive Linguistics and has been President of the Polish Cognitive Linguistics Association since 2002.

Résumé
«This book did raise some very interesting issues overall. The role of Aristotle and his praise for metaphor, raised in one essay, suggests that this is an important area of study for societies that had contact with ancient Greek philosophical principles [...] considering the diversity of contributors, I was impressed by the structure of the book which was, overall, cohesive.» (R Natasha Amendola, Journal of the Australian Early Medieval Association)

Contenu

Contents: Seana Coulson: The Literal/Nonliteral Distinction - Mark Turner: The Literal Versus Figurative Dichotomy - Elzbieta Tabakowska: «Figurative»: Subjectification of Meaning in A (Literary) Text - Margaret H. Freeman: Is Iconicity Literal? Cognitive Poetics and the Literal Concept in Poetry - Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk: The Nature of Negation: Literal Or Not-Literal - Todd Oakley: Negation and Blending: A Cognitive Rhetorical Approach - Seana Coulson: Sarcasm and the Space Structuring Model - Michael Israel: The Rhetoric of 'Literal Meaning' - Begoña Vicente: Meaning in Relevance Theory and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction - Zoltán Kövecses: Is Thought (Meaning) Essentially Literal? The Relationship Between Literal-Figurative and Concrete-Abstract Meanings - Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr.: Literal and Nonliteral Meanings Are Corrupt Ideas: A View From Psycholinguistics - Noa Shuval/Rachel Giora: Beyond Figurativeness: Optimal Innovation and Pleasure - Benjamin Bergen: Mental Simulation in Literal and Figurative Language Understanding - Alan Cienki: Gesture and the Question of Literal Versus Non-Literal Reference - Gerard Steen: What Counts as a Metaphorically Used Word? The Pragglejaz Experience - Per Aage Brandt: Literalness and the Nature of Meaning - Mateusz W. Oleksy: Embodied Realism and Its Challenge to Philosophy - Tim Adamson: What is Metaphorical Cognition? Two Philosophical Models - Afterword: Why Literal Meaning? An Interview with George Lakoff.