Landmark Cases in EU Law, Volume 2

This 2-volume set on EU landmark cases discusses the most iconic judgments developed by the European Court of Justice since 1957. The European Court of Justice has played a fundamental role in the construction of the European Union in the past 70 years. Its ''landmark'' decisions have often been controversial; yet no-one could deny that they have been crucial in ''constituting'' the Union legal order as we find it today. From Van Gend en Loos and Costa v ENEL to Cassis de Dijon and Kadi , Landmark Cases in EU Law explores the most important and well-known cases in two volumes. Volume 2 introduces the ''substantive cases'' that have shaped the Union''s internal market and internal or external policies. Each case is placed in its historical and doctrinal context, and each chapter presents the history of its reception by the Court and academia.>

Préface
This two-volume work on landmark cases discusses the most iconic judgments developed by the European Court of Justice since 1957.

Auteur

Paul Craig is Emeritus Professor of English Law at St John's College, Oxford, UK.
Robert Schütze is Professor of European Union and Comparative Public Law at Durham University, UK, and LUISS (Rome), Italy.

Résumé

This two-volume work on EU law discusses the most iconic judgments by the European Court of Justice.

It shows how the European Court of Justice has played a fundamental role in the construction of the European Union in the past 70 years. Many EU 'landmark' cases have been controversial, yet no-one can deny that they have been essential in 'constituting' the Union legal order as we find it today.

From Van Gend en Loos and Costa v ENEL to Cassis de Dijon and Kadi, Landmark Cases in EU Law explores the most important and well-known EU law cases in two volumes.

Volume 2 explores the 'substantive' cases that have shaped the Union's internal market and internal or external policies. Each case is placed in its historical and doctrinal context, and each chapter presents the history of its reception by the Court and academia.

Contenu

Introduction Paul Craig (University of Oxford, UK) and Robert Schütze (Durham University, UK) Part A: The Free Movement of Goods and Services 1. Dassonville and Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade Peter Oliver (Monckton Chambers, UK) 2. Cassis de Dijon and the Principle of Mutual Recognition Jukka Snell (**University of Turku, Finland) 3. Keck and Mithouard Stephen Weatherill (University of Oxford, UK) 4. To Keck and Back: Alpine Investment and Export Restrictions on the Free Movement of Services Barend van Leeuwen (Durham University, UK) 5. Laval and Beyond: Collective Labour Rights and Free Movement of Services Silvana Sciarra (Constitutional Court of Italy) and Lorenzo Cecchetti (LUISS University, Italy) Part B: The Free Movement of Persons and EU Citizenship 6. Bosman and the Horizontal Direct Effect of Free Movement Stefaan Van den Bogaert (Leiden University, Netherlands) 7. Reinhard Gebhard v Consiglio dell'Ordine degli Avvocati e Procuratori di Milano Vassilis Hatzopoulos (European Law and Governance School, Greece) 8. Baumbast and the Rise of EU Citizenship Daniel Thym (**University of Konstanz, Germany) 9. Ruiz Zambrano and the Essential Core of Union Citizenship Niamh Nic Shuibhne (University of Edinburgh, UK) 10. Centros and the Free Movement of Companies Wolf-Georg Ringe (University of Copenhagen*, Denmark) *Part C: Competition Law and the Internal Market 11. Consten and Grundig Alison Jones (Kings College London, UK) 12. Métropole Télévision and a Rule of Reason Okeoghene Odudu (University of Cambridge, UK) 13. Hoffmann La Roche and the Notion of Abuse Pablo Ibáñez Colomo (London School of Economics, UK) 14. Continental Can and the Birth of Merger Control Giorgio Monti (Tilburg University, Netherlands) 15. Twenty Years After: Is Altmark a Landmark Decision in EU State Aid Law? Andrea Biondi (King's College London, UK) Part D: Internal and External Union Policies 16. EU Criminal Law as Constitutional Law: Melloni and its Aftermath Valsamis Mitsilegas (Queen Mary University of London, UK) 17. The Taricco Saga: When Direct Effect and the Duty to Disapply Meet the Principle of Legality in Criminal Matters Danielle Gallo (LUISS University, Italy) 18. Pringle and European Monetary Union Alicia Hinarejos (McGill University, Canada) 19. Bilka and EU Antidiscrimination Law Philippa Watson (City, University of London, UK) 20. Opinion 1/94 and the Common Commercial Policy Andrés Delgado Casteleiro (Durham University, UK)