The Dual Penal State

Markus Dubber illuminates paradoxes of state power and challenges for the project of liberal criminal law. The book must attract the attention of a wide readership across legal systems and legal traditions. The concept of a dual penal state proves a useful instrument to shed a critical light on historical developments in criminal law and criminal law science, both in Germany and the United States.

Auteur
Markus D. Dubber is Professor of Law and Director of the Centre for Ethics at the University of Toronto. Much of Markus's scholarship has focused on theoretical, comparative, and historical aspects of criminal law. He has published, as author or editor, over twenty books as well as over eighty papers ; his work has appeared in English and German, and has been translated into Arabic, Chinese, Italian, Korean, Persian, Portuguese and Spanish. His publications include The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Law (with Christopher Tomlins) (2018); Criminal Law: A Comparative Approach (with Tatjana Hörnle) (2014); The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Law (with Tatjana Hörnle) (2014); Foundational Texts in Modern Criminal Law (2014); The New Police Science: The Police Power in Domestic and International Governance (with Maria Valverde) (2006); The Police Power: Patriarchy and the Foundations of American Government (2005); and Victims in the War on Crime (2002).

Texte du rabat

This book provides an accessible introduction to the theoretical frameworks of the dual penal state. Taking an issue-led approach, the study locates criminal law in its analytic, comparative, historical, and doctrinal contexts, and aims to stimulate critical reflection beyond the constraints of a particular jurisdiction.

Résumé
The Dual Penal State addresses one of today's most pressing social and political issues: the rampant, at best haphazard, and ever-expanding use of penal power by states ostensibly committed to the enlightenment-based legal-political project of Western liberal democracy. Penal regimes in these states operate in a wide field of ill-considered and barely constrained violence where radical and prolonged interference with citizens, upon whose autonomy the legitimacy of state power supposedly rests, has been utterly normalized. At its heart, the crisis of modern penality is a crisis of the liberal project itself and the penal paradox is the sharpest formulation of the general paradox of power in a liberal state: the legitimacy of state sovereignty in the name of personal autonomy. To capture the depth and range of the crisis of contemporary penality in ostensibly liberal states the book adopts a fresh approach. It uses historical and comparative analysis to reveal the fundamental distinction between two conceptions of penal power - penal law and penal police - that runs through Western legal-political history: one rooted in autonomy, equality, and interpersonal respect, and the other in heteronomy, hierarchy, and patriarchal power. This dual penal state analysis illuminates how the law/police distinction manifests itself in various penal systems, from the American war on crime to the ahistorical methods of German criminal law science.

Contenu

• Introduction: The Crisis of the Modern Penal State

• PART I CRIMINAL LAW SCIENCE AND ITS DIVERSIONS

• 1: Engaging Scholarship: Criminal Law and the Legitimation of Penal Power

• 2: The Rhetoric of Criminal Law: Sloganism and Other Coping Mechanisms

• PART II THE DUAL PENAL STATE: TOWARD A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF CRIMINAL LAW

• 3: Law and Police as Modes of Governance

• 4: Penal Law and Penal Police in the Dual Penal State

• PART III AMERICAN PENALITY BETWEEN LAW AND POLICE: A CRITICAL GENEALOGY

• 5: America's Internal Penal Exceptionalism

• 6: Thomas Jefferson's Virginia Criminal Law Bill

• 7: The Model Penal Code and the War on Crime