On the Wrong Side of The Law

This book, the first of a two volume study, provides an historical account of complaints against Metropolitan police officers between formation of the force in 1829 and codification of remedies for misconduct under the Police Act 1964. A complainant centred standpoint is developed to counteract the marginalization of the interests of victims, which is held to demonstrate that the drive for effective and efficient law enforcement has overshadowed the public interest in holding officers to account for misconduct. After officer accountability before the criminal courts diminished in the nineteenth century, missed opportunities to reform complaints procedures following commissions of inquiry in 1906-08, 1928 and 1960-62 are discussed. The second volume of the study, Combating Impunity: Complaints Against Metropolitan Police, 1964-2021 , will examine the part played by complainants and civil society organisations in combating police impunity in the citizen oversight era.

Develops an alternative complainant-centred narrative on police complaints and officer accountability for misconduct Traces the history of complaints against officers serving with the Metropolitan Police between formation of the force in 1829 and codification of the complaints system under the Police Act 1964 The first of a two volume study, provides the historical background to an enduring police policy dilemma that has seen the formation of four independent oversight bodies in the last half-a-century

Auteur

Graham Smith is Senior Lecturer in Regulation in the School of Law at the University of Manchester, UK and co-founder of ManReg: The Manchester Centre for Regulation, Governance and Public Law. Graham has close to 40 years of experience in the field of police misconduct and officer accountability as a complainant, civil rights activist, consultant, researcher and international expert on human rights law. In recent years he has advised governments on behalf of the Council of Europe on criminal justice reform and combating impunity for torture and ill-treatment.

Contenu

1. Introduction: Standpoint.- 2. Disciplined Force.- 3. The Police And Public Vigilance Society And Royal Commission Upon The Duties Of The Metropolitan Police.- 4. Resort To Home Secretary.- 5. Adjusted Responsibilities Of The Home Secretary And Met Commissioner (Fisher V Oldham Corporation And Constabulary Independence).- 6. Internal Affairs.- 7. To Be Concluded.

   <p