Prix bas
CHF164.00
Habituellement expédié sous 2 à 4 semaines.
Auteur
Dr. Eda ahin is a lecturer at EU School of Law. She was awarded a Doctorate in Law at Queen Mary, University of London. She holds an LLM in Competition Law and Policy from the University of East Anglia. Her LLM thesis examined the passing-on defence in competition law in the EU, US and Turkey. She holds business administration and law degrees from the University of Istanbul, Turkey. Eda was admitted to Istanbul Bar in 2007. She is also the editor of the Global Antitrust Review which is published annually by the Interdisciplinary Centre for Competition Law and Policy, Queen Mary, University of London. After graduation, she returned to Turkey, and started working as a lecturer in law at a public university in Turkey in order to serve her compulsory work in return for the Ministry of National Education's scholarship she received to pursue her doctorate in the UK. In her current position as a lecturer, she is responsible for teaching Law of Obligations and Property Law at the undergraduate level and UK Contract Law and Family Law at the postgraduate level.
Texte du rabat
Exploring obstacles to effective compensation of victims of competition infringements, this book categorises the types of victims harmed and the types of losses arisen from these infringements to identify to what extent there is a need for enhanced private competition law enforcement in the European Union.
Contenu
Table of Contents
Preface
Acknowledgements
List of Abbreviations
Table of Cases
Table of Legislation
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
I. Background *
Paucity of Actions for Damages for Competition Infringements
The Need for Collective Redress in Competition Law Enforcement
Reflection on the Term 'Collective Redress'
II. Issues relating to the Design of a Collective Redress Action
Judicial v Non-Judicial Means of Collective Redress
Elements of Collective Redress Actions
III. Methodology
IV. Structure
CHAPTER 2
THE NOTION OF AND NEED FOR COLLECTIVE REDRESS ACTIONS
I. Introduction
II. The Concept and Function of Collective Redress Procedures
A Short Summary of Evolution and Policy Rationale
The Purpose of the Procedure
III. Setting the Scene for EU Collective Redress Actions
The Recognition and Exercise of the Right to Damages
The Need for Collective Redress Actions for Consumers
2.1. Barriers to the Effective Compensation of Consumers
2.2. Inadequacy of Existing Aggregation Mechanisms
IV. Concluding Remarks
CHAPTER 3
COMMISSION INITIATIVES ON COLLECTIVE REDRESS ACTIONS
I. Introduction
II. Two Distinct Initiatives in Competition and Consumer Law
1.1. The Green Paper
1.2. The White Paper
1.3. Withdrawn Directive in 2009 *
III. Combining the Two: A Horizontal Approach toward Collective Redress Actions
Overview of the Reasons leading to Horizontal Approach
The Proposals Under the Horizontal Approach
2.1. Public Consultation
2.2. Recommendation and Communication
IV. Distinctive Approach toward Collective Redress Actions
Potential Shortcomings of the Horizontal Approach
The Case for a Distinctive Competition Law Approach
V. Concluding Remarks
CHAPTER 4
OBJECTIVES OF COLLECTIVE REDRESS ACTIONS IN EU COMPETITION ENFORCEMENT
I. Introduction
II. Determining the Objectives and Their Significance
III. Objectives of Actions for Damages
The Approach of the EU Courts
The Approach of the Commission
IV. Compensation and Deterrence Objectives for Collective Redress Actions
The Unique Competition Law Enforcement Goal and its Implications for Collective Redress Actions
Objectives of Collective Redress Actions
2.1. The Compensatory Objective
2.2. The Deterrence Objective
V. Concluding Remarks
CHAPTER 5
CONSUMER DAMAGES CLAIMS IN EU COMPETITION CASES
I. Introduction
II. Damages Caused by Competition Infringements
The Types of Competition Infringements
The Types of Harm Resulting from Competition Infringements
Potential Damages of Competition Infringements
III. The Overcharge as a Measure of Damages in Consumer Cases *
1.1. Practices Giving Rise to Overcharge
1.2. Case Studies
1.2.1. Case Study 1
1.2.2. Case Study 2
2.1. Practices Giving Rise to Overcharge
2.2. Case Studies
2.2.1. Case Study 1
2.2.2. Case Study 2
IV. The Ways in Which Consumers are Harmed
Direct Consumers
Indirect Consumers
Deadweight Loss Consumers
Umbrella Consumers
V. Concluding Remarks
CHAPTER 6
GROUPING COLLECTIVE CLAIMS: OPT-IN v OPT-OUT
I. Introduction
II. Establishing the Group Membership
Opt-In Actions
Mandatory Actions
Opt-Out Actions
3.1. The Functioning of Opt-Out Actions
3.2. The Role of Notice
3.3. The Compensation Objective and Opt-Out Actions
3.3.1. Participation Rates
3.3.2. Take-Up Rates
4.1. Reflections
4.2. Assessing the Criticisms
4.2.1. Overview of the Criticisms
4.2.2. The Merits of the Criticisms
III. Grouping the Claims
The Ways in Which the Group is Defined
Two Necessary Elements of Group Definition
Towards an Adequate Group Definition: What Matters?
3.1. The Type of Loss
3.2. The Type of Plaintiff
IV. Concluding Remarks
CHAPTER 7
DESIGNING COLLECTIVE REDRESS ACTIONS: REPRESENTATIVE PARTY AND FUNDING RULES
I. Introduction
II. Determining the Representative Party
Lead Plaintiff
Ideological Claimant
III. Funding
Liability for Costs
Possible Options for Funding
Contingency Fees as One of the Options
The Proposed Approach
IV. Concluding Remarks
CHAPTER 8
CALCULATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF DAMAGES IN COLLECTIVE ACTIONS FOR CONSUMERS
I. Introduction
II. Possible Ways of Awarding Damages to a Group
Aggregate versus Individual Damages Assessment
Aggregate Damages Assessment and the Compensation Objective
III. Calculation of Damages to Consumers
IV. Allocation of Damages
Distribution of Damages to Group Members
Possible Alternatives for Undistributed Damages and the Proposed Approach
V. Concluding Remarks
CHAPTER 9
CONCLUSIONS
Bibliography
index